Warning: include_once(/home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-content/mu-plugins/cl-smart-advice.php): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php on line 442

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-content/mu-plugins/cl-smart-advice.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/opt/cpanel/ea-php82/root/usr/share/pear') in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php on line 442

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property YourChannel_Updater::$name_key is deprecated in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-content/plugins/yourchannel/YourChannel.php on line 848

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property YourChannel_Updater::$version is deprecated in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-content/plugins/yourchannel/YourChannel.php on line 851

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property YourChannel_Updater::$name is deprecated in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-content/plugins/yourchannel/YourChannel.php on line 853

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-settings.php:442) in /home/geghna/ethiopianism.net/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831
{"id":5057,"date":"2010-07-23T10:36:19","date_gmt":"2010-07-23T08:36:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ethiopianism.net\/?p=5057"},"modified":"2013-07-25T10:14:29","modified_gmt":"2013-07-25T08:14:29","slug":"southern-sudan-anti-slavery-referendum-faces-resistance-by-au-dictators","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ethiopianism.net\/5057\/southern-sudan-anti-slavery-referendum-faces-resistance-by-au-dictators\/","title":{"rendered":"Southern Sudan Anti Slavery Referendum faces resistance by AU dictators"},"content":{"rendered":"

Southern Sudan Anti Slavery Referendum faces resistance by AU dictators by Prof. Muse Tegegne<\/strong><\/em>
\n\"\"The 2005 Sudanese Comprehensive Peace Agreement<\/a>t (CPA) ignited\u00a0\u00a0the long awaited vision \u00a0to self-determination in the \u00a0Greater Horn of \u00a0Africa subgegated and colonially divided people of Africa. CPA \u00a0is hope and victory against slavery and\u00a0religious\u00a0extremism\u00a0in Africa. The southerners \u00a0have been\u00a0victims\u00a0of an\u00a0abolished\u00a0slavery\u00a0in 21 first century. They merit\u00a0to determine their future in their own hands. They are not fighting for self determination only but also for the eradication of slavery from the last bastion of the\u00a0institution\u00a0in Sudan. <\/span><\/p>\n

Though <\/em>slavery<\/em><\/a> never completely died out in <\/em>Sudan<\/em><\/a>, there has been a relatively recent upsurge in <\/em>slave-taking<\/em><\/span> that has its roots in <\/em>Islam<\/em><\/a>. According to <\/em>John Eibner<\/em><\/a>, an historian and human rights specialist writing in <\/em>Middle East Quarterly<\/em><\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n

“<\/span>Sudan is the only place where <\/em>chattel slavery<\/em><\/a> is not just surviving but experiencing a great revival. This renascence of the <\/em>slave trade<\/em><\/a> began in the mid-1980s and resulted directly from an upsurge of <\/em>Islamism<\/em><\/a> in <\/em>Sudan<\/em><\/a> at that time, and especially from the <\/em>Islamist<\/em><\/a> emphasis on the renewal of <\/em>jihad<\/em><\/a>. After gaining the upper-hand in<\/em>Khartoum<\/em><\/a> by about 1983, the Islamists’ immediate goal was to transform the multi-ethnic, multi-religious population of Sudan into an Arab-dominated Muslim state, and to do so through jihad. Under <\/em>Turabi<\/em><\/a>‘s powerful influence, the ruler of the time, <\/em>Ja\u2018far an-Numayri<\/em><\/a>, declared himself to be (sounding like a <\/em>caliph<\/em><\/a> of old), the “rightly guided” leader of an Islamic state<\/em>.”<\/p>\n

As Kampala hosts the African Union (AU) summit the question remains: Is Africa neutral with regard to the unity of the Sudan? AU chairman Jean Ping put it clearly during Africa Day last May, with due respect to the outcome of the coming referendum, that AU favours \u2018making unity attractive,\u2019 and cautioned against possible southern Sudan independence in 2011.<\/p>\n

<\/object><\/p>\n

CPA weakened many \u00a0dictators who \u00a0 are \u00a0submitted to the international justice led by the International Criminal Court (ICC<\/a>) through some international pressures by organiztions line Genocide Watch \u00a0 giving hope to \u00a0regions of post\u00a0colonial\u00a0countries\u00a0of \u00a0scrambled\u00a0continent a hope of self-determination\u00a0 though\u00a0referendum.<\/p>\n

International pressures took place in some channels after the ICCIndictment<\/a> and the issuing of the arrest warrants against\u00a0Omar al Bashir<\/a>, the leader of the dictatorial regime in Sudan and some gangs in the\u00a0Darfur Rebels<\/a> who committed war crimes in the western region of\u00a0Darfur<\/a>. Soon Ethiopian \u00a0and another\u00a0dictators\u00a0will follow having regions fighting and\u00a0claiming\u00a0self determination. \u00a0Somaliland would be the\u00a0next\u00a0candidate for international recognition to put a\u00a0silver\u00a0lining to find a lasting solution of\u00a0Somalia.<\/p>\n

[media id=72 width=320 height=240]<\/p>\n

The AU\u00a0believed\u00a0that the \u00a0southern secession would set a dangerous precedent for Africa. This position was expressed by many African leaders, particularly by Idris Deby of Chad and Isaias Afewerki of Eritrea \u00a0after assuring his \u00a0own\u00a0independence\u00a0in 1991. \u00a0The \u00a0Group of African Ambassadors at the United Nations held a meeting last month at the AU mission in New York, in the presence of the panel\u2019s chairman, Thabo Mbeki, and called upon the Sudanese people to benefit from the historic experiments and dedicate efforts to bolstering unity through a strong support from Africa.<\/p>\n

The Sudanese Comprehensive Peace Agreement consists of the Machakos Protocol, the Power Sharing, the Wealth Sharing, the Resolution of the Abyei Conflict, the Resolution of the Conflict in the two States of Southern Kurdufan and Blue Nile, the Security Arrangements, the Permanent Ceasefire and Security Arrangements Implementation Modalities and Appendices, and the Implementation Modalities and Global Implementation Matrix and Appendices.<\/p>\n

CPA will voile for the first time the \u00a0historical position \u00a0which is is not in any way circumstantial but and in retrospect, a rather a systematic and principled position that streamlines and concords with that of the founding fathers of OAU, for whom the inviolability of states boundaries remained an article of faith. This was manifestly reflected in their firm rejection of almost all secessions bids in Africa in Nigeria, Congo, Somalia or elsewhere.<\/p>\n

The Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed by \u00a0the late Dr. John Garang de Mabior, the Chairman of the Sudan People\u2019s Liberation Movement\/Army (SPLM\/SPLA) and Ali Osman Mohammed Taha, First Vice President of the Republic of Sudan.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Slave girl and boys<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Many African leaders on behalf of the Intergovernmental Authority of Development (IGAD) witnessed it with other representatives of the regional authority. The other witnesses from the area included representative of the League of Arab States and the Chairman of the African Union and the Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs.<\/p>\n

The Au leaders had accepted in 1964 \u00a0though mindful of the artificial frontiers drawn by imperialist powers, meant to divide the peoples of Africa, our founding fathers were keen to deny the colonialists a chance to reap any fruit for their divide and conquer policy; by denying secessionists legitimacy.<\/p>\n

However, if secession is to prevail, and the post-referendum negotiations have started, let us concur on appropriate benchmarks and measures that would guarantee a peaceful transition. At the same time, try to draw a roadmap for an understanding that would pave the way for a near future reunification.<\/p>\n

Representatives from the international political powers included the Italian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Special Envoy of the Netherlands, the Norwegian Minister of International Development, the British Secretary of State for International Development, the United States Secretary of State, the Representative of the European Union.<\/p>\n

Paradoxically, Malik Agar, the deputy chairman of the SPLM and the governor of the Blue Nile State, was fiercely attacked and incriminated recently for being true to the CPA, calling for the unity of the Sudan. Indeed there is widely held concern that secession shall make the south more susceptible to yet more violence or even further secessions. Relations between and within communities and regions in the south remained strained by competition for natural resources such as water, grazing land as well as by cattle raiding, local power rivalries and disputes.<\/p>\n

Southern \u00a0Independence\u00a0is not \u00a0what the\u00a0Khartoum\u00a0government\u00a0is \u00a0definitely \u00a0aspires for. The government, while dauntlessly launching a massive campaign for unity of the Sudan, affirms now and again that the decision of the southern Sudanese people will be respected regardless of the outcome of the 2011 referendum. Simply applying cost-benefit analysis in the current circumstances indicates that unity remains at its worst scenario a lesser evil. Sudanese unity is not beyond repair; let us agree on new viable institutional formula that may keep unity intact for the sake of Sudan and Africa at large.<\/p>\n

by Prof. Muse Tegegne<\/strong><\/p>\n

[media id=71 width=320 height=240]<\/p>\n

More readings :-<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n